Crear una cuenta gratis
¡Hágase miembro de Calaméo para que pueda publicar y compartir documentos con el mundo!
Calificar y comentar sus publicaciones favoritas, descargar documentos y compartir sus lecturas con los amigos.
Are the rights and obligations arising from a license transferable under Article 40 of the Privatization and Commercialization Act? Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of November 20, 2008 (Ref. No. III SK 13/08).
8 páginas
Publicado por
Michal Mijal
Vol.
2011, 4(4)
Are the rights and obligations arising from a license transferable
under Article 40 of the Privatization and Commercialization Act?
Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court
of November 20, 2008 (Ref.
No.
III...
[Más]
Vol.
2011, 4(4)
Are the rights and obligations arising from a license transferable
under Article 40 of the Privatization and Commercialization Act?
Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court
of November 20, 2008 (Ref.
No.
III SK 13/08).
Facts
The judgement of the Supreme Court here described refers to the acquisition
of rights arising from a license by an entity which has acquitted a state enterprise
as a result of direct privatization, pursuant to Article 40 of the Act of 20 August
1996 on Privatization and Commercialization1 (hereafter PCA).
In the event the
aforementioned acquisition occurs, the purchaser shall become the subject of the
rights and obligations under the license; inter alia the purchaser is eligible to request
performing the amendment of the decision which granted the license under Article
155 of the Code of Administrative Procedure (hereafter: CAP).
Therefore the crucial issue of this judgement is general succession in the event of
the direct privatizat
[Menos]
Tags
administrative,
article,
case,
claimant,
court,
decision,
direct,
economic,
enterprise,
judgement,
legal,
license,
obligations,
president,
privatization,
rights,
supreme
